Delete / Löschen
1946 Raleighs
AMuzi
05.05.2012 - 13:22
05.05.2012 - 13:22
http://film.britishcouncil.org/how-a-bicycle-is-made
--
Andrew Muzi
<www.yellowjersey.org/>
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
Lou Holtman
05.05.2012 - 14:45
05.05.2012 - 14:45
http://film.britishcouncil.org/how-a-bicycle-is-made
Nice! Thanks. Those were the days.
Lou
Cam
05.05.2012 - 15:43
05.05.2012 - 15:43
<lou.email@anonym; wrote:
Op 5-5-2012 13:22, AMuzi schreef:
http://film.britishcouncil.org/how-a-bicycle-is-made
Nice! Thanks. Those were the days.
Lou
Gripping yarn! Boffo!
Sepp Ruf
05.05.2012 - 19:08
05.05.2012 - 19:08
Lou Holtman wrote:
Op 5-5-2012 13:22, AMuzi schreef:
http://film.britishcouncil.org/how-a-bicycle-is-made
Nice! Thanks. Those were the days.
At 6:58, see the swastika? Workers showing their support for Philip
Battenberg's engagement?
Op 5-5-2012 13:22, AMuzi schreef:
http://film.britishcouncil.org/how-a-bicycle-is-made
Nice! Thanks. Those were the days.
At 6:58, see the swastika? Workers showing their support for Philip
Battenberg's engagement?
"Tom $herman (-_-)"
05.05.2012 - 19:54
05.05.2012 - 19:54
On 5/5/2012 6:22 AM, A. Muzi wrote:
http://film.britishcouncil.org/how-a-bicycle-is-made
The absence of safety glasses and machine guards, as well as the amount
of non-automated labor) is striking to someone who has worked in a more
modern factory. Labor was inexpensive, as the British worker at the
time was still poor [1] compared to a couple of decades later, and could
barely afford to buy the bicycles they made.
Management was short-sighted, as profits went to a select few
stockholders, instead of being re-invested in modernization. British
executives who visited Japan in the 1960's were shocked to see how far
behind they were, and were unable to react when the Japanese started
exporting in earnest to the "West" in the late 1960's.
[1] The profits of the British Empire always having gone to the highly
secretive Corporation of the Crown (owner of the City of London [2]),
and not being shared among the people, who were actually taxed to
support the Corporation.
[2] Not to be confused with the much large metropolis of London
surrounding it: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_London>.
--
Tºm Shermªn - 42.435731°N, 83.985007°W
Post Free or Die!
http://film.britishcouncil.org/how-a-bicycle-is-made
The absence of safety glasses and machine guards, as well as the amount
of non-automated labor) is striking to someone who has worked in a more
modern factory. Labor was inexpensive, as the British worker at the
time was still poor [1] compared to a couple of decades later, and could
barely afford to buy the bicycles they made.
Management was short-sighted, as profits went to a select few
stockholders, instead of being re-invested in modernization. British
executives who visited Japan in the 1960's were shocked to see how far
behind they were, and were unable to react when the Japanese started
exporting in earnest to the "West" in the late 1960's.
[1] The profits of the British Empire always having gone to the highly
secretive Corporation of the Crown (owner of the City of London [2]),
and not being shared among the people, who were actually taxed to
support the Corporation.
[2] Not to be confused with the much large metropolis of London
surrounding it: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_London>.
--
Tºm Shermªn - 42.435731°N, 83.985007°W
Post Free or Die!
Lou Holtman
05.05.2012 - 20:11
05.05.2012 - 20:11
Op zaterdag 5 mei 2012 19:54:16 UTC+2 schreef Tom $herman (-_-) het volgend=
e:
On 5/5/2012 6:22 AM, A. Muzi wrote:
>
> http://film.britishcouncil.org/how-a-bicycle-is-made
>
The absence of safety glasses and machine guards, as well as the amount=
0
of non-automated labor) is striking to someone who has worked in a more=
0
modern factory. Labor was inexpensive, as the British worker at the0
time was still poor [1] compared to a couple of decades later, and could=
0
barely afford to buy the bicycles they made.
0
Management was short-sighted, as profits went to a select few0
stockholders, instead of being re-invested in modernization. British0
executives who visited Japan in the 1960's were shocked to see how far0
behind they were, and were unable to react when the Japanese started0
exporting in earnest to the "West" in the late 1960's.
0
[1] The profits of the British Empire always having gone to the highly0
secretive Corporation of the Crown (owner of the City of London [2]),0
and not being shared among the people, who were actually taxed to0
support the Corporation.
0
[2] Not to be confused with the much large metropolis of London0
surrounding it: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_London>.
0
--0
TAm ShermAn - 42.4357310N, 83.9850070W
Post Free or Die!
Geezzz, is this the first thing you think of when you seen this clip? Man, =
you must have a miserable life...
Lou
e:
On 5/5/2012 6:22 AM, A. Muzi wrote:
>
> http://film.britishcouncil.org/how-a-bicycle-is-made
>
The absence of safety glasses and machine guards, as well as the amount=
0
of non-automated labor) is striking to someone who has worked in a more=
0
modern factory. Labor was inexpensive, as the British worker at the0
time was still poor [1] compared to a couple of decades later, and could=
0
barely afford to buy the bicycles they made.
0
Management was short-sighted, as profits went to a select few0
stockholders, instead of being re-invested in modernization. British0
executives who visited Japan in the 1960's were shocked to see how far0
behind they were, and were unable to react when the Japanese started0
exporting in earnest to the "West" in the late 1960's.
0
[1] The profits of the British Empire always having gone to the highly0
secretive Corporation of the Crown (owner of the City of London [2]),0
and not being shared among the people, who were actually taxed to0
support the Corporation.
0
[2] Not to be confused with the much large metropolis of London0
surrounding it: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_London>.
0
--0
TAm ShermAn - 42.4357310N, 83.9850070W
Post Free or Die!
Geezzz, is this the first thing you think of when you seen this clip? Man, =
you must have a miserable life...
Lou
"Tom $herman (-_-)"
05.05.2012 - 20:21
05.05.2012 - 20:21
On 5/5/2012 1:11 PM, Lou Holtman wrote:
Op zaterdag 5 mei 2012 19:54:16 UTC+2 schreef Tom $herman (-_-) het volgende:
On 5/5/2012 6:22 AM, A. Muzi wrote:
http://film.britishcouncil.org/how-a-bicycle-is-made
The absence of safety glasses and machine guards, as well as the amount
of non-automated labor) is striking to someone who has worked in a more
modern factory. Labor was inexpensive, as the British worker at the
time was still poor [1] compared to a couple of decades later, and could
barely afford to buy the bicycles they made.
Management was short-sighted, as profits went to a select few
stockholders, instead of being re-invested in modernization. British
executives who visited Japan in the 1960's were shocked to see how far
behind they were, and were unable to react when the Japanese started
exporting in earnest to the "West" in the late 1960's.
[1] The profits of the British Empire always having gone to the highly
secretive Corporation of the Crown (owner of the City of London [2]),
and not being shared among the people, who were actually taxed to
support the Corporation.
[2] Not to be confused with the much large metropolis of London
surrounding it:<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_London>.
--
Tºm Shermªn - 42.435731°N, 83.985007°W
Post Free or Die!
Geezzz, is this the first thing you think of when you seen this clip? Man, you must have a miserable life...
Lou
Do not be too smug - there is a concerted effort to dismantle the
current systems in Western Europe and make them much more like the US.
Go across the English Channel to see the most advanced case. And the
ECB is having it's way with Portugal, Spain, Italy, and Greece, with
austerity for workers, and subsidies for investment bankers.
--
Tºm Shermªn - 42.435731°N, 83.985007°W
Post Free or Die!
AMuzi
05.05.2012 - 22:09
05.05.2012 - 22:09
Tom $herman (-_-) > wrote:
On 5/5/2012 1:11 PM, Lou Holtman wrote:
Op zaterdag 5 mei 2012 19:54:16 UTC+2 schreef Tom $herman (-_-) het
volgende:
On 5/5/2012 6:22 AM, A. Muzi wrote:
http://film.britishcouncil.org/how-a-bicycle-is-made
The absence of safety glasses and machine guards, as well as the amount
of non-automated labor) is striking to someone who has worked in a more
modern factory. Labor was inexpensive, as the British worker at the
time was still poor [1] compared to a couple of decades later, and could
barely afford to buy the bicycles they made.
Management was short-sighted, as profits went to a select few
stockholders, instead of being re-invested in modernization. British
executives who visited Japan in the 1960's were shocked to see how far
behind they were, and were unable to react when the Japanese started
exporting in earnest to the "West" in the late 1960's.
[1] The profits of the British Empire always having gone to the highly
secretive Corporation of the Crown (owner of the City of London [2]),
and not being shared among the people, who were actually taxed to
support the Corporation.
[2] Not to be confused with the much large metropolis of London
surrounding it:<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_London>.
--
Tºm Shermªn - 42.435731°N, 83.985007°W
Post Free or Die!
Geezzz, is this the first thing you think of when you seen this clip?
Man, you must have a miserable life...
Lou
Do not be too smug - there is a concerted effort to dismantle the
current systems in Western Europe and make them much more like the US.
Go across the English Channel to see the most advanced case. And the
ECB is having it's way with Portugal, Spain, Italy, and Greece, with
austerity for workers, and subsidies for investment bankers.
As Margaret Thatcher pithily noted, socialism works until
you run out of other people's money. Europe's party is over.
Europe is at least honest in its profligacy. It's not better
here, we merely have The Big Lie and a faster printing
press. The foreseeable end will be a debacle in both cases
when the music stops.
--
Andrew Muzi
<www.yellowjersey.org/>
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
On 5/5/2012 1:11 PM, Lou Holtman wrote:
Op zaterdag 5 mei 2012 19:54:16 UTC+2 schreef Tom $herman (-_-) het
volgende:
On 5/5/2012 6:22 AM, A. Muzi wrote:
http://film.britishcouncil.org/how-a-bicycle-is-made
The absence of safety glasses and machine guards, as well as the amount
of non-automated labor) is striking to someone who has worked in a more
modern factory. Labor was inexpensive, as the British worker at the
time was still poor [1] compared to a couple of decades later, and could
barely afford to buy the bicycles they made.
Management was short-sighted, as profits went to a select few
stockholders, instead of being re-invested in modernization. British
executives who visited Japan in the 1960's were shocked to see how far
behind they were, and were unable to react when the Japanese started
exporting in earnest to the "West" in the late 1960's.
[1] The profits of the British Empire always having gone to the highly
secretive Corporation of the Crown (owner of the City of London [2]),
and not being shared among the people, who were actually taxed to
support the Corporation.
[2] Not to be confused with the much large metropolis of London
surrounding it:<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_London>.
--
Tºm Shermªn - 42.435731°N, 83.985007°W
Post Free or Die!
Geezzz, is this the first thing you think of when you seen this clip?
Man, you must have a miserable life...
Lou
Do not be too smug - there is a concerted effort to dismantle the
current systems in Western Europe and make them much more like the US.
Go across the English Channel to see the most advanced case. And the
ECB is having it's way with Portugal, Spain, Italy, and Greece, with
austerity for workers, and subsidies for investment bankers.
As Margaret Thatcher pithily noted, socialism works until
you run out of other people's money. Europe's party is over.
Europe is at least honest in its profligacy. It's not better
here, we merely have The Big Lie and a faster printing
press. The foreseeable end will be a debacle in both cases
when the music stops.
--
Andrew Muzi
<www.yellowjersey.org/>
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
"Tom $herman (-_-)"
05.05.2012 - 22:20
05.05.2012 - 22:20
On 5/5/2012 3:09 PM, A. Muzi wrote:
Tom $herman (-_-) > wrote:
On 5/5/2012 1:11 PM, Lou Holtman wrote:
Op zaterdag 5 mei 2012 19:54:16 UTC+2 schreef Tom $herman (-_-) het
volgende:
On 5/5/2012 6:22 AM, A. Muzi wrote:
http://film.britishcouncil.org/how-a-bicycle-is-made
The absence of safety glasses and machine guards, as well as the amount
of non-automated labor) is striking to someone who has worked in a more
modern factory. Labor was inexpensive, as the British worker at the
time was still poor [1] compared to a couple of decades later, and
could
barely afford to buy the bicycles they made.
Management was short-sighted, as profits went to a select few
stockholders, instead of being re-invested in modernization. British
executives who visited Japan in the 1960's were shocked to see how far
behind they were, and were unable to react when the Japanese started
exporting in earnest to the "West" in the late 1960's.
[1] The profits of the British Empire always having gone to the highly
secretive Corporation of the Crown (owner of the City of London [2]),
and not being shared among the people, who were actually taxed to
support the Corporation.
[2] Not to be confused with the much large metropolis of London
surrounding it:<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_London>.
--
Tºm Shermªn - 42.435731°N, 83.985007°W
Post Free or Die!
Geezzz, is this the first thing you think of when you seen this clip?
Man, you must have a miserable life...
Lou
Do not be too smug - there is a concerted effort to dismantle the
current systems in Western Europe and make them much more like the US.
Go across the English Channel to see the most advanced case. And the
ECB is having it's way with Portugal, Spain, Italy, and Greece, with
austerity for workers, and subsidies for investment bankers.
As Margaret Thatcher pithily noted, socialism works until you run out of
other people's money. Europe's party is over.
Thatcher is a criminal who should be breaking rocks in a labor camp, and
one of the primary persons responsible for destroying British industry
and degrading quality of life of those unconnected to the City (i.e.
Corporation of the Crown).
We have socialism for investment bankers, where taxes from wages earned
by labor pay for their losses. Indeed, that is unsustainable.
Europe is at least honest in its profligacy. It's not better here, we
merely have The Big Lie and a faster printing press. The foreseeable end
will be a debacle in both cases when the music stops.
If you think the US is run by anything other than the organized crime
ring known as the super-rich (who are too wealthy to be listed Forbes
and other mass-media outlets on their lists), you are sadly misinformed.
The problem is not lack of actual wealth, but a financial system that is
rigged to benefit a few thousand people at the expense of the other 7
billion. We are, as war criminal Henry Kissinger said, nothing by
"worthless eaters" in their eyes.
--
Tºm Shermªn - 42.435731°N, 83.985007°W
Post Free or Die!
Tom $herman (-_-) > wrote:
On 5/5/2012 1:11 PM, Lou Holtman wrote:
Op zaterdag 5 mei 2012 19:54:16 UTC+2 schreef Tom $herman (-_-) het
volgende:
On 5/5/2012 6:22 AM, A. Muzi wrote:
http://film.britishcouncil.org/how-a-bicycle-is-made
The absence of safety glasses and machine guards, as well as the amount
of non-automated labor) is striking to someone who has worked in a more
modern factory. Labor was inexpensive, as the British worker at the
time was still poor [1] compared to a couple of decades later, and
could
barely afford to buy the bicycles they made.
Management was short-sighted, as profits went to a select few
stockholders, instead of being re-invested in modernization. British
executives who visited Japan in the 1960's were shocked to see how far
behind they were, and were unable to react when the Japanese started
exporting in earnest to the "West" in the late 1960's.
[1] The profits of the British Empire always having gone to the highly
secretive Corporation of the Crown (owner of the City of London [2]),
and not being shared among the people, who were actually taxed to
support the Corporation.
[2] Not to be confused with the much large metropolis of London
surrounding it:<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_London>.
--
Tºm Shermªn - 42.435731°N, 83.985007°W
Post Free or Die!
Geezzz, is this the first thing you think of when you seen this clip?
Man, you must have a miserable life...
Lou
Do not be too smug - there is a concerted effort to dismantle the
current systems in Western Europe and make them much more like the US.
Go across the English Channel to see the most advanced case. And the
ECB is having it's way with Portugal, Spain, Italy, and Greece, with
austerity for workers, and subsidies for investment bankers.
As Margaret Thatcher pithily noted, socialism works until you run out of
other people's money. Europe's party is over.
Thatcher is a criminal who should be breaking rocks in a labor camp, and
one of the primary persons responsible for destroying British industry
and degrading quality of life of those unconnected to the City (i.e.
Corporation of the Crown).
We have socialism for investment bankers, where taxes from wages earned
by labor pay for their losses. Indeed, that is unsustainable.
Europe is at least honest in its profligacy. It's not better here, we
merely have The Big Lie and a faster printing press. The foreseeable end
will be a debacle in both cases when the music stops.
If you think the US is run by anything other than the organized crime
ring known as the super-rich (who are too wealthy to be listed Forbes
and other mass-media outlets on their lists), you are sadly misinformed.
The problem is not lack of actual wealth, but a financial system that is
rigged to benefit a few thousand people at the expense of the other 7
billion. We are, as war criminal Henry Kissinger said, nothing by
"worthless eaters" in their eyes.
--
Tºm Shermªn - 42.435731°N, 83.985007°W
Post Free or Die!
AMuzi
05.05.2012 - 22:45
05.05.2012 - 22:45
Tom $herman (-_-) > wrote:
On 5/5/2012 3:09 PM, A. Muzi wrote:
Tom $herman (-_-) > wrote:
On 5/5/2012 1:11 PM, Lou Holtman wrote:
Op zaterdag 5 mei 2012 19:54:16 UTC+2 schreef Tom $herman (-_-) het
volgende:
On 5/5/2012 6:22 AM, A. Muzi wrote:
http://film.britishcouncil.org/how-a-bicycle-is-made
The absence of safety glasses and machine guards, as well as the
amount
of non-automated labor) is striking to someone who has worked in a
more
modern factory. Labor was inexpensive, as the British worker at the
time was still poor [1] compared to a couple of decades later, and
could
barely afford to buy the bicycles they made.
Management was short-sighted, as profits went to a select few
stockholders, instead of being re-invested in modernization. British
executives who visited Japan in the 1960's were shocked to see how far
behind they were, and were unable to react when the Japanese started
exporting in earnest to the "West" in the late 1960's.
[1] The profits of the British Empire always having gone to the highly
secretive Corporation of the Crown (owner of the City of London [2]),
and not being shared among the people, who were actually taxed to
support the Corporation.
[2] Not to be confused with the much large metropolis of London
surrounding it:<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_London>.
--
Tߺm Shermߪn - 42.435731߰N, 83.985007߰W
Post Free or Die!
Geezzz, is this the first thing you think of when you seen this clip?
Man, you must have a miserable life...
Lou
Do not be too smug - there is a concerted effort to dismantle the
current systems in Western Europe and make them much more like the US.
Go across the English Channel to see the most advanced case. And the
ECB is having it's way with Portugal, Spain, Italy, and Greece, with
austerity for workers, and subsidies for investment bankers.
As Margaret Thatcher pithily noted, socialism works until you run out of
other people's money. Europe's party is over.
Thatcher is a criminal who should be breaking rocks in a labor camp, and
one of the primary persons responsible for destroying British industry
and degrading quality of life of those unconnected to the City (i.e.
Corporation of the Crown).
We have socialism for investment bankers, where taxes from wages earned
by labor pay for their losses. Indeed, that is unsustainable.
Europe is at least honest in its profligacy. It's not better here, we
merely have The Big Lie and a faster printing press. The foreseeable end
will be a debacle in both cases when the music stops.
If you think the US is run by anything other than the organized crime
ring known as the super-rich (who are too wealthy to be listed Forbes
and other mass-media outlets on their lists), you are sadly misinformed.
The problem is not lack of actual wealth, but a financial system that is
rigged to benefit a few thousand people at the expense of the other 7
billion. We are, as war criminal Henry Kissinger said, nothing by
"worthless eaters" in their eyes.
Margaret Thatcher Fan Club chart:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2010/apr/25/uk-public-spending-1963
I rest my case
--
Andrew Muzi
<www.yellowjersey.org/>
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
On 5/5/2012 3:09 PM, A. Muzi wrote:
Tom $herman (-_-) > wrote:
On 5/5/2012 1:11 PM, Lou Holtman wrote:
Op zaterdag 5 mei 2012 19:54:16 UTC+2 schreef Tom $herman (-_-) het
volgende:
On 5/5/2012 6:22 AM, A. Muzi wrote:
http://film.britishcouncil.org/how-a-bicycle-is-made
The absence of safety glasses and machine guards, as well as the
amount
of non-automated labor) is striking to someone who has worked in a
more
modern factory. Labor was inexpensive, as the British worker at the
time was still poor [1] compared to a couple of decades later, and
could
barely afford to buy the bicycles they made.
Management was short-sighted, as profits went to a select few
stockholders, instead of being re-invested in modernization. British
executives who visited Japan in the 1960's were shocked to see how far
behind they were, and were unable to react when the Japanese started
exporting in earnest to the "West" in the late 1960's.
[1] The profits of the British Empire always having gone to the highly
secretive Corporation of the Crown (owner of the City of London [2]),
and not being shared among the people, who were actually taxed to
support the Corporation.
[2] Not to be confused with the much large metropolis of London
surrounding it:<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_London>.
--
Tߺm Shermߪn - 42.435731߰N, 83.985007߰W
Post Free or Die!
Geezzz, is this the first thing you think of when you seen this clip?
Man, you must have a miserable life...
Lou
Do not be too smug - there is a concerted effort to dismantle the
current systems in Western Europe and make them much more like the US.
Go across the English Channel to see the most advanced case. And the
ECB is having it's way with Portugal, Spain, Italy, and Greece, with
austerity for workers, and subsidies for investment bankers.
As Margaret Thatcher pithily noted, socialism works until you run out of
other people's money. Europe's party is over.
Thatcher is a criminal who should be breaking rocks in a labor camp, and
one of the primary persons responsible for destroying British industry
and degrading quality of life of those unconnected to the City (i.e.
Corporation of the Crown).
We have socialism for investment bankers, where taxes from wages earned
by labor pay for their losses. Indeed, that is unsustainable.
Europe is at least honest in its profligacy. It's not better here, we
merely have The Big Lie and a faster printing press. The foreseeable end
will be a debacle in both cases when the music stops.
If you think the US is run by anything other than the organized crime
ring known as the super-rich (who are too wealthy to be listed Forbes
and other mass-media outlets on their lists), you are sadly misinformed.
The problem is not lack of actual wealth, but a financial system that is
rigged to benefit a few thousand people at the expense of the other 7
billion. We are, as war criminal Henry Kissinger said, nothing by
"worthless eaters" in their eyes.
Margaret Thatcher Fan Club chart:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2010/apr/25/uk-public-spending-1963
I rest my case
--
Andrew Muzi
<www.yellowjersey.org/>
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
"Tom $herman (-_-)"
05.05.2012 - 23:07
05.05.2012 - 23:07
On 5/5/2012 3:45 PM, A. Muzi wrote:
Tom $herman (-_-) > wrote:
On 5/5/2012 3:09 PM, A. Muzi wrote:
Tom $herman (-_-) > wrote:
On 5/5/2012 1:11 PM, Lou Holtman wrote:
Op zaterdag 5 mei 2012 19:54:16 UTC+2 schreef Tom $herman (-_-) het
volgende:
On 5/5/2012 6:22 AM, A. Muzi wrote:
>
> http://film.britishcouncil.org/how-a-bicycle-is-made
>
The absence of safety glasses and machine guards, as well as the
amount
of non-automated labor) is striking to someone who has worked in a
more
modern factory. Labor was inexpensive, as the British worker at the
time was still poor [1] compared to a couple of decades later, and
could
barely afford to buy the bicycles they made.
Management was short-sighted, as profits went to a select few
stockholders, instead of being re-invested in modernization. British
executives who visited Japan in the 1960's were shocked to see how
far
behind they were, and were unable to react when the Japanese started
exporting in earnest to the "West" in the late 1960's.
[1] The profits of the British Empire always having gone to the
highly
secretive Corporation of the Crown (owner of the City of London [2]),
and not being shared among the people, who were actually taxed to
support the Corporation.
[2] Not to be confused with the much large metropolis of London
surrounding it:<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_London>.
--
T߂ºm Sherm߂ªn - 42.435731߂°N, 83.985007߂°W
Post Free or Die!
Geezzz, is this the first thing you think of when you seen this clip?
Man, you must have a miserable life...
Lou
Do not be too smug - there is a concerted effort to dismantle the
current systems in Western Europe and make them much more like the US.
Go across the English Channel to see the most advanced case. And the
ECB is having it's way with Portugal, Spain, Italy, and Greece, with
austerity for workers, and subsidies for investment bankers.
As Margaret Thatcher pithily noted, socialism works until you run out of
other people's money. Europe's party is over.
Thatcher is a criminal who should be breaking rocks in a labor camp,
and one of the primary persons responsible for destroying British
industry and degrading quality of life of those unconnected to the
City (i.e. Corporation of the Crown).
We have socialism for investment bankers, where taxes from wages
earned by labor pay for their losses. Indeed, that is unsustainable.
Europe is at least honest in its profligacy. It's not better here, we
merely have The Big Lie and a faster printing press. The foreseeable end
will be a debacle in both cases when the music stops.
If you think the US is run by anything other than the organized crime
ring known as the super-rich (who are too wealthy to be listed Forbes
and other mass-media outlets on their lists), you are sadly misinformed.
The problem is not lack of actual wealth, but a financial system that
is rigged to benefit a few thousand people at the expense of the other
7 billion. We are, as war criminal Henry Kissinger said, nothing by
"worthless eaters" in their eyes.
Margaret Thatcher Fan Club chart:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2010/apr/25/uk-public-spending-1963
I rest my case
But the Cameron/Clegg austerity measures are not bringing the promised
growth, but rather shrinking of the economy, falling wages for those
outside The City, and higher unemployment.
But hey, if you have an ideology to support, only listen to sources you
agree with.
Keynes was correct, and Friedman wrong. Sorry about that. :)
--
Tºm Shermªn - 42.435731°N, 83.985007°W
Post Free or Die!
Tom $herman (-_-) > wrote:
On 5/5/2012 3:09 PM, A. Muzi wrote:
Tom $herman (-_-) > wrote:
On 5/5/2012 1:11 PM, Lou Holtman wrote:
Op zaterdag 5 mei 2012 19:54:16 UTC+2 schreef Tom $herman (-_-) het
volgende:
On 5/5/2012 6:22 AM, A. Muzi wrote:
>
> http://film.britishcouncil.org/how-a-bicycle-is-made
>
The absence of safety glasses and machine guards, as well as the
amount
of non-automated labor) is striking to someone who has worked in a
more
modern factory. Labor was inexpensive, as the British worker at the
time was still poor [1] compared to a couple of decades later, and
could
barely afford to buy the bicycles they made.
Management was short-sighted, as profits went to a select few
stockholders, instead of being re-invested in modernization. British
executives who visited Japan in the 1960's were shocked to see how
far
behind they were, and were unable to react when the Japanese started
exporting in earnest to the "West" in the late 1960's.
[1] The profits of the British Empire always having gone to the
highly
secretive Corporation of the Crown (owner of the City of London [2]),
and not being shared among the people, who were actually taxed to
support the Corporation.
[2] Not to be confused with the much large metropolis of London
surrounding it:<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_London>.
--
T߂ºm Sherm߂ªn - 42.435731߂°N, 83.985007߂°W
Post Free or Die!
Geezzz, is this the first thing you think of when you seen this clip?
Man, you must have a miserable life...
Lou
Do not be too smug - there is a concerted effort to dismantle the
current systems in Western Europe and make them much more like the US.
Go across the English Channel to see the most advanced case. And the
ECB is having it's way with Portugal, Spain, Italy, and Greece, with
austerity for workers, and subsidies for investment bankers.
As Margaret Thatcher pithily noted, socialism works until you run out of
other people's money. Europe's party is over.
Thatcher is a criminal who should be breaking rocks in a labor camp,
and one of the primary persons responsible for destroying British
industry and degrading quality of life of those unconnected to the
City (i.e. Corporation of the Crown).
We have socialism for investment bankers, where taxes from wages
earned by labor pay for their losses. Indeed, that is unsustainable.
Europe is at least honest in its profligacy. It's not better here, we
merely have The Big Lie and a faster printing press. The foreseeable end
will be a debacle in both cases when the music stops.
If you think the US is run by anything other than the organized crime
ring known as the super-rich (who are too wealthy to be listed Forbes
and other mass-media outlets on their lists), you are sadly misinformed.
The problem is not lack of actual wealth, but a financial system that
is rigged to benefit a few thousand people at the expense of the other
7 billion. We are, as war criminal Henry Kissinger said, nothing by
"worthless eaters" in their eyes.
Margaret Thatcher Fan Club chart:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2010/apr/25/uk-public-spending-1963
I rest my case
But the Cameron/Clegg austerity measures are not bringing the promised
growth, but rather shrinking of the economy, falling wages for those
outside The City, and higher unemployment.
But hey, if you have an ideology to support, only listen to sources you
agree with.
Keynes was correct, and Friedman wrong. Sorry about that. :)
--
Tºm Shermªn - 42.435731°N, 83.985007°W
Post Free or Die!
Dan O
05.05.2012 - 23:16
05.05.2012 - 23:16
On May 5, 1:09 pm, AMuzi <a...@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
Tom $herman (-_-) > wrote:
> On 5/5/2012 1:11 PM, Lou Holtman wrote:
>> Op zaterdag 5 mei 2012 19:54:16 UTC+2 schreef Tom $herman (-_-) het
>> volgende:
>>> On 5/5/2012 6:22 AM, A. Muzi wrote:
>>>>http://film.britishcouncil.org/how-a-bicycle-is-made
>>> The absence of safety glasses and machine guards, as well as the amou=
nt
>>> of non-automated labor) is striking to someone who has worked in a mo=
re
>>> modern factory. Labor was inexpensive, as the British worker at the
>>> time was still poor [1] compared to a couple of decades later, and co=
uld
>>> barely afford to buy the bicycles they made.
>>> Management was short-sighted, as profits went to a select few
>>> stockholders, instead of being re-invested in modernization. British
>>> executives who visited Japan in the 1960's were shocked to see how fa=
r
>>> behind they were, and were unable to react when the Japanese started
>>> exporting in earnest to the "West" in the late 1960's.
>>> [1] The profits of the British Empire always having gone to the highl=
y
>>> secretive Corporation of the Crown (owner of the City of London [2]),
>>> and not being shared among the people, who were actually taxed to
>>> support the Corporation.
>>> [2] Not to be confused with the much large metropolis of London
>>> surrounding it:<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_London>.
>>> --
>>> TAm ShermAn - 42.4357310N, 83.9850070W
>>> Post Free or Die!
>> Geezzz, is this the first thing you think of when you seen this clip?
>> Man, you must have a miserable life...
>> Lou
> Do not be too smug - there is a concerted effort to dismantle the
> current systems in Western Europe and make them much more like the US.
> Go across the English Channel to see the most advanced case. And the
> ECB is having it's way with Portugal, Spain, Italy, and Greece, with
> austerity for workers, and subsidies for investment bankers.
As Margaret Thatcher pithily noted, socialism works until
you run out of other people's money. Europe's party is over.
Ideally, people would be utterly perplexed if some space / time
traveler dropped in and brought up the concept of "money".
Europe is at least honest in its profligacy. It's not better
here, we merely have The Big Lie and a faster printing
press. The foreseeable end will be a debacle in both cases
when the music stops.
It doesn't look encouraging, but which way do we want to go out? What
would Gene Roddenberry do?
Tom $herman (-_-) > wrote:
> On 5/5/2012 1:11 PM, Lou Holtman wrote:
>> Op zaterdag 5 mei 2012 19:54:16 UTC+2 schreef Tom $herman (-_-) het
>> volgende:
>>> On 5/5/2012 6:22 AM, A. Muzi wrote:
>>>>http://film.britishcouncil.org/how-a-bicycle-is-made
>>> The absence of safety glasses and machine guards, as well as the amou=
nt
>>> of non-automated labor) is striking to someone who has worked in a mo=
re
>>> modern factory. Labor was inexpensive, as the British worker at the
>>> time was still poor [1] compared to a couple of decades later, and co=
uld
>>> barely afford to buy the bicycles they made.
>>> Management was short-sighted, as profits went to a select few
>>> stockholders, instead of being re-invested in modernization. British
>>> executives who visited Japan in the 1960's were shocked to see how fa=
r
>>> behind they were, and were unable to react when the Japanese started
>>> exporting in earnest to the "West" in the late 1960's.
>>> [1] The profits of the British Empire always having gone to the highl=
y
>>> secretive Corporation of the Crown (owner of the City of London [2]),
>>> and not being shared among the people, who were actually taxed to
>>> support the Corporation.
>>> [2] Not to be confused with the much large metropolis of London
>>> surrounding it:<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_London>.
>>> --
>>> TAm ShermAn - 42.4357310N, 83.9850070W
>>> Post Free or Die!
>> Geezzz, is this the first thing you think of when you seen this clip?
>> Man, you must have a miserable life...
>> Lou
> Do not be too smug - there is a concerted effort to dismantle the
> current systems in Western Europe and make them much more like the US.
> Go across the English Channel to see the most advanced case. And the
> ECB is having it's way with Portugal, Spain, Italy, and Greece, with
> austerity for workers, and subsidies for investment bankers.
As Margaret Thatcher pithily noted, socialism works until
you run out of other people's money. Europe's party is over.
Ideally, people would be utterly perplexed if some space / time
traveler dropped in and brought up the concept of "money".
Europe is at least honest in its profligacy. It's not better
here, we merely have The Big Lie and a faster printing
press. The foreseeable end will be a debacle in both cases
when the music stops.
It doesn't look encouraging, but which way do we want to go out? What
would Gene Roddenberry do?
Peter Cole
06.05.2012 - 00:12
06.05.2012 - 00:12
On 5/5/2012 4:45 PM, AMuzi wrote:
Tom $herman (-_-) > wrote:
On 5/5/2012 3:09 PM, A. Muzi wrote:
Tom $herman (-_-) > wrote:
On 5/5/2012 1:11 PM, Lou Holtman wrote:
Op zaterdag 5 mei 2012 19:54:16 UTC+2 schreef Tom $herman (-_-) het
volgende:
On 5/5/2012 6:22 AM, A. Muzi wrote:
>
> http://film.britishcouncil.org/how-a-bicycle-is-made
>
The absence of safety glasses and machine guards, as well as the
amount
of non-automated labor) is striking to someone who has worked in a
more
modern factory. Labor was inexpensive, as the British worker at the
time was still poor [1] compared to a couple of decades later, and
could
barely afford to buy the bicycles they made.
Management was short-sighted, as profits went to a select few
stockholders, instead of being re-invested in modernization. British
executives who visited Japan in the 1960's were shocked to see how
far
behind they were, and were unable to react when the Japanese started
exporting in earnest to the "West" in the late 1960's.
[1] The profits of the British Empire always having gone to the
highly
secretive Corporation of the Crown (owner of the City of London [2]),
and not being shared among the people, who were actually taxed to
support the Corporation.
[2] Not to be confused with the much large metropolis of London
surrounding it:<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_London>.
--
Tߺm Shermߪn - 42.435731߰N, 83.985007߰W
Post Free or Die!
Geezzz, is this the first thing you think of when you seen this clip?
Man, you must have a miserable life...
Lou
Do not be too smug - there is a concerted effort to dismantle the
current systems in Western Europe and make them much more like the US.
Go across the English Channel to see the most advanced case. And the
ECB is having it's way with Portugal, Spain, Italy, and Greece, with
austerity for workers, and subsidies for investment bankers.
As Margaret Thatcher pithily noted, socialism works until you run out of
other people's money. Europe's party is over.
Thatcher is a criminal who should be breaking rocks in a labor camp,
and one of the primary persons responsible for destroying British
industry and degrading quality of life of those unconnected to the
City (i.e. Corporation of the Crown).
We have socialism for investment bankers, where taxes from wages
earned by labor pay for their losses. Indeed, that is unsustainable.
Europe is at least honest in its profligacy. It's not better here, we
merely have The Big Lie and a faster printing press. The foreseeable end
will be a debacle in both cases when the music stops.
If you think the US is run by anything other than the organized crime
ring known as the super-rich (who are too wealthy to be listed Forbes
and other mass-media outlets on their lists), you are sadly misinformed.
The problem is not lack of actual wealth, but a financial system that
is rigged to benefit a few thousand people at the expense of the other
7 billion. We are, as war criminal Henry Kissinger said, nothing by
"worthless eaters" in their eyes.
Margaret Thatcher Fan Club chart:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2010/apr/25/uk-public-spending-1963
I rest my case
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CBO_-_Revenues_and_Outlays_as_percent_GDP.png
Moral: (at least in US) If you want to lower the deficit, put a Democrat
in the White House.
Of course maybe, as Cheney said, deficits don't matter. They didn't seem
to post WWII: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:USDebt.png
Of course the real way to balance budgets is to create more jobs by
putting all that idle money to work, something the conservatives have
had a very difficult time doing, historically.
Progressive? Fair?
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2011/0415/Taxes-and-the-rich-How-much-do-they-pay-now
"To put it in numbers, according to the analysis, the top 1 percent of
earners account for 20.3 percent of total personal income in the United
States and pay 21.5 percent of all federal and state taxes. The middle
20 percent of households earn 11.6 percent of US income and pay 10.3
percent of taxes. The lowest 20 percent account for just 3.5 percent of
income, and pay 2 percent of all taxes."
Tom $herman (-_-) > wrote:
On 5/5/2012 3:09 PM, A. Muzi wrote:
Tom $herman (-_-) > wrote:
On 5/5/2012 1:11 PM, Lou Holtman wrote:
Op zaterdag 5 mei 2012 19:54:16 UTC+2 schreef Tom $herman (-_-) het
volgende:
On 5/5/2012 6:22 AM, A. Muzi wrote:
>
> http://film.britishcouncil.org/how-a-bicycle-is-made
>
The absence of safety glasses and machine guards, as well as the
amount
of non-automated labor) is striking to someone who has worked in a
more
modern factory. Labor was inexpensive, as the British worker at the
time was still poor [1] compared to a couple of decades later, and
could
barely afford to buy the bicycles they made.
Management was short-sighted, as profits went to a select few
stockholders, instead of being re-invested in modernization. British
executives who visited Japan in the 1960's were shocked to see how
far
behind they were, and were unable to react when the Japanese started
exporting in earnest to the "West" in the late 1960's.
[1] The profits of the British Empire always having gone to the
highly
secretive Corporation of the Crown (owner of the City of London [2]),
and not being shared among the people, who were actually taxed to
support the Corporation.
[2] Not to be confused with the much large metropolis of London
surrounding it:<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_London>.
--
Tߺm Shermߪn - 42.435731߰N, 83.985007߰W
Post Free or Die!
Geezzz, is this the first thing you think of when you seen this clip?
Man, you must have a miserable life...
Lou
Do not be too smug - there is a concerted effort to dismantle the
current systems in Western Europe and make them much more like the US.
Go across the English Channel to see the most advanced case. And the
ECB is having it's way with Portugal, Spain, Italy, and Greece, with
austerity for workers, and subsidies for investment bankers.
As Margaret Thatcher pithily noted, socialism works until you run out of
other people's money. Europe's party is over.
Thatcher is a criminal who should be breaking rocks in a labor camp,
and one of the primary persons responsible for destroying British
industry and degrading quality of life of those unconnected to the
City (i.e. Corporation of the Crown).
We have socialism for investment bankers, where taxes from wages
earned by labor pay for their losses. Indeed, that is unsustainable.
Europe is at least honest in its profligacy. It's not better here, we
merely have The Big Lie and a faster printing press. The foreseeable end
will be a debacle in both cases when the music stops.
If you think the US is run by anything other than the organized crime
ring known as the super-rich (who are too wealthy to be listed Forbes
and other mass-media outlets on their lists), you are sadly misinformed.
The problem is not lack of actual wealth, but a financial system that
is rigged to benefit a few thousand people at the expense of the other
7 billion. We are, as war criminal Henry Kissinger said, nothing by
"worthless eaters" in their eyes.
Margaret Thatcher Fan Club chart:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2010/apr/25/uk-public-spending-1963
I rest my case
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CBO_-_Revenues_and_Outlays_as_percent_GDP.png
Moral: (at least in US) If you want to lower the deficit, put a Democrat
in the White House.
Of course maybe, as Cheney said, deficits don't matter. They didn't seem
to post WWII: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:USDebt.png
Of course the real way to balance budgets is to create more jobs by
putting all that idle money to work, something the conservatives have
had a very difficult time doing, historically.
Progressive? Fair?
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2011/0415/Taxes-and-the-rich-How-much-do-they-pay-now
"To put it in numbers, according to the analysis, the top 1 percent of
earners account for 20.3 percent of total personal income in the United
States and pay 21.5 percent of all federal and state taxes. The middle
20 percent of households earn 11.6 percent of US income and pay 10.3
percent of taxes. The lowest 20 percent account for just 3.5 percent of
income, and pay 2 percent of all taxes."
Peter Cole
06.05.2012 - 00:27
06.05.2012 - 00:27
On 5/5/2012 4:09 PM, AMuzi wrote:
Europe is at least honest in its profligacy. It's not better here, we
merely have The Big Lie and a faster printing press. The foreseeable end
will be a debacle in both cases when the music stops.
The music stops when the fat cats take their ball and go home. That's
what happened in 1929 and 2008. The factories are still there, people
are still willing to work and purchase, nothing has changed except on
some abstract market, but everything grinds to a halt and we start
accumulating real losses, from which many people will never recover.
Look at what happened in Japan.
The real deficit isn't between revenues and expenses, it's the deficit
of what could be made/built/invented and what isn't and won't be. Those
are real tangible losses, not paper ones. The clock is ticking and the
meter is running. Deficit hawks will piss away a decade at a time when
humanity can least afford it. It's swell if you can spend the time
swanning around your Boca retreat or skiing in Aspen, , but for us
working stiffs, not so great.
The only socialism in the US has been for the financial sector. Funny
how that works -- or doesn't, obviously.
Europe is at least honest in its profligacy. It's not better here, we
merely have The Big Lie and a faster printing press. The foreseeable end
will be a debacle in both cases when the music stops.
The music stops when the fat cats take their ball and go home. That's
what happened in 1929 and 2008. The factories are still there, people
are still willing to work and purchase, nothing has changed except on
some abstract market, but everything grinds to a halt and we start
accumulating real losses, from which many people will never recover.
Look at what happened in Japan.
The real deficit isn't between revenues and expenses, it's the deficit
of what could be made/built/invented and what isn't and won't be. Those
are real tangible losses, not paper ones. The clock is ticking and the
meter is running. Deficit hawks will piss away a decade at a time when
humanity can least afford it. It's swell if you can spend the time
swanning around your Boca retreat or skiing in Aspen, , but for us
working stiffs, not so great.
The only socialism in the US has been for the financial sector. Funny
how that works -- or doesn't, obviously.
06.05.2012 - 02:06
"AMuzi" <email@anonym; wrote in message
news:jo32hd$amc$email@anonym...
http://film.britishcouncil.org/how-a-bicycle-is-made
--
Andrew Muzi
<www.yellowjersey.org/>
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
The "back stays" @14:50 - 15:10 installed after the bike was dipped in
enamel, and bolted on. You work on any of those these ever?
Ähnliche Themen
| Thema | Antworten |
|---|---|
| 01.04.2012 - 09:20 Maybe we should have "met" in 1946 |
0 |
| 28.11.2011 - 20:13 O.S.S. (USA) 1946 |
1 |
| 19.01.2010 - 05:22 1946 Phototonne V-2 in USA |
2 |
| 24.03.2012 - 21:06 váºnâ cuả Cá»ng Sản Viá»t Nam từ 1946 |
0 |
| 29.06.2011 - 19:48 6.3.1946, HCM dda~ nho? nu+o+'c ma('t ca' sa^'u kho'c ho^ ho^', dda^'m ngu+.c the^` ra(`ng: To^i, Ho^` Chi' Minh kho^ng bao gio+` ba'n nu+o+'c! |
1 |
| 17.01.2012 - 01:04 This is from 1946, I think; but it is wonderful |
1 |
| 02.08.2010 - 16:49 August 2, 1946 |
6 |
| 18.01.2010 - 20:31 "My Reputation" (1946) |
12 |
| 28.02.2010 - 05:15 San Quentin (USA) 1946 |
4 |
| 28.05.2012 - 06:49 Let There Be Light (USA) 1946 |
0 |
| 17.05.2010 - 21:50 Ta.i sao co' Nga`y sinh nha^.t HCM 19.5.1946 ta.i Ha` No^.i? |
1 |
| 05.06.2012 - 22:52 1946 ME article ... |
5 |
| 19.01.2010 - 06:31 Hello Dolly! (Jan. 19, 1946) |
1 |
| 18.03.2011 - 18:35 The Shadow: Behind the Mask (1946) |
7 |
| 01.12.2011 - 18:27 The Best Years of Our Lives (USA) 1946 |
29 |
